Every person, career, and pension case is unique...

Pension Center
- Legal Assistance in Pension Matters -

Preferential Pension for Gas Workers under List No. 1 in Ukraine

Upon reaching the applicable retirement age and meeting the statutory requirements, a person may become entitled to pension payments from the state. Under Ukraine’s solidarity pension system, a person’s pension rights are closely connected with their insurance record and the social insurance contributions paid during periods of official employment.

Age is also an important factor in determining pension entitlement. Under the general rules, entitlement to an old-age pension depends on reaching the statutory retirement age and having the required insurance record. However, different rules may apply to occupations involving particularly difficult or harmful working conditions.

Ukrainian legislation provides lists of industries, types of work, occupations, positions and indicators in which employment may entitle a person to an old-age pension on preferential terms. These occupations are divided into List No. 1 and List No. 2.

In this article, we will consider an occupation covered by List No. 1 within the category of ore preparation, beneficiation, agglomeration (sintering, briquetting and pelletising), and roasting of ores and non-metallic minerals – the occupation of a gas worker.

What are the conditions for obtaining a preferential pension for a gas worker?

The occupation involves particularly difficult and harmful working conditions. Employees whose work as gas workers qualifies under List No. 1 may generally be entitled to an old-age pension on preferential terms from the age of 50. Men generally need at least 25 years of insurance record, including at least 10 years of qualifying List No. 1 employment. Women generally need at least 20 years of insurance record, including at least 7 years and 6 months of qualifying List No. 1 employment.

One of the most common problems when applying for this type of preferential pension concerns errors, inaccuracies or incomplete entries in the employment record book. Such deficiencies may result in the Pension Fund refusing to recognise particular periods as preferential service. Since the employment record book is one of the primary documents used to confirm a person’s employment history, the accuracy and completeness of its entries may be particularly important in pension proceedings.

It is important to remember that an employee should not be held responsible for errors made by the employer when completing and maintaining the employment record book.

If the Pension Fund of Ukraine refuses to recognise a period of qualifying employment because of deficiencies in the employment record book, additional evidence may be obtained from the former employer or, where appropriate, from an archive or legal successor. A clarifying certificate may confirm the applicant’s occupation, period of employment, nature of the work and other information necessary to establish entitlement to preferential service. Such documents can then be submitted to the Pension Fund in support of the applicant’s pension claim.

Ukrainian administrative court practice confirms that formal deficiencies in employment documents should not automatically deprive an employee of pension rights where the actual period and nature of employment can be established by appropriate evidence. The legal positions developed by Ukrainian courts may therefore be important when challenging a refusal by the Pension Fund.

Therefore, employees planning to apply for a preferential pension should, where possible, review their employment records in advance and check whether the relevant entries correctly identify their occupation, periods of employment and the nature of the work performed. If errors or missing information are identified, it may be advisable to obtain additional supporting documents before applying for a pension. If the Pension Fund nevertheless refuses to recognise qualifying List No. 1 employment without sufficient legal grounds, its decision may be challenged before an administrative court.


heading_title

Отзывы наших клиентов